Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Archaic wrote:
> 
>> That just seems silly. Warn was much nicer and still allowed things to
>> proceed.
> 
> 
> Can we not still warn, but just leave the exit status as '0'.  The spec
> (from the quote given) doesn't appear to forbid output, it just mandates
> what the exit status should be.
> 
+1.0000000  (I like the precision)

R.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to