Matthew Burgess wrote: > Archaic wrote: > >> That just seems silly. Warn was much nicer and still allowed things to >> proceed. > > > Can we not still warn, but just leave the exit status as '0'. The spec > (from the quote given) doesn't appear to forbid output, it just mandates > what the exit status should be. > +1.0000000 (I like the precision)
R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page