Matthew Burgess wrote: > It appears as though 'tcsh' doesn't, but how many alternative shells > should we even care about?
Plus, tcsh is a C shell, not a Bourne shell. All the bootscripts are written for a Bourne shell, and will consequently fail horribly if run in csh or tcsh. ;-) So I don't think tcsh not supporting these builtins is a big deal.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
