Anyone ever read this?

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2005-04/msg00002.html

I especially noted the statement:

"If you especially want to compile glibc using GCC development snapshots, then you should be working with the current development version of glibc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/). That code is not yet ready for release, but already builds well with GCC 4, and fixes many new compilation warnings that you will still see in 2.3.6."

Again, as I see things, if we want to be using gcc4 we should be doing it correctly and using the code that is meant for it, ie, glibc snapshots, *not* trying to patch glibc ourselves. I know that it 'works' at this point, but it still doesn't feel correct. Cross-LFS already has exposed a bug that is resolved simply by switching to the snapshot.

Anyway, I've spoken on this point before, I won't bring it up again. But, I saw this message just now, and as they say, 'from the horse's mouth'...

--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to