Steve Prior wrote:
I don't disagree with that philosophy JH. What I think should be the issue
now is to determine how serious this GLIBC issue really is. If it is a
serious security issue and therefore makes "LFS 6.1 stable" a defective
release (don't
mean this as bad work against the LFS group, just that a bad apple got into
the pile), then I think it might be time for LFS 6.1.1 which the LiveCD
could then track
faithfully.
Yes, my point exactly. If the bug is in LFS then *that* should be fixed
and released, and in turn, the LiveCD can follow suit.
Thanks for the detailed reply, Steve.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
