Hi, Well, Archaic as subjected before we could discuss that. I think it is absolutely not against the goal of LFS, because pointing out how a sane working system can be created has nothing to do with any dev-tools installed.
Further more I would like to her some comments from others on this tought. Deviding chap 6 into optional dev-tool packs and essential packs could be explained to the user. BTW, Greg did a great job with his DIY approach that has also some optional packs available. This and many more could be discussed here and also the package manager debate could be seen as an option like in Gregs great stuff. regards Bernd -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Archaic Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2005 16:34 An: LFS Developers Mailinglist Betreff: Re: Community discussion: including any devel-tools in LFS Chap. 6 On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:33:24PM +0100, Feldmeier Bernd wrote: > > This could really lead to a clean target rootfs approach > without the need of any devel tools ... Which would be completely against the stated goal of LFS. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
