Archaic wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:23:06PM -0700, Jeremy Herbison wrote: > >>Now won't udev require headers for the new functionality? Seems the >>linux-libc-headers project is defunct at this point (he promised a 2.6.14 >>release by 3 weeks ago, and now he's just MIA). > > > If a CVS pull must be done, so be it. This is a development branch, not > a testing or stable branch. If it is too much for some people to handle, > then I would suggest a branch as these changes should be made in the > book ASAP to allow time for testing. At this point, 2.6.15 is the only > significant thing holding us back from a 6.2 release and the sooner we > can get it into trunk and and rough edges knocked off, the sooner we can > move it to a testing branch for fine-grained stabilization.
And, I'd like to point out, that the reason that we use svn is that we can easily revert changes. The development branch is not a -rc or a -pre anything. It is (or should be) a means to develop needed functionality. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
