On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:36:34 -0600 Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Ennis wrote these words on 01/24/06 00:23 CST: > > > This may well be the case, but many people will > > view the site using this particular non-standard, > > whether or not they are a target audience. > > If it looks bad and is easy to fix but remains > > unfixed due to lack of "catering" then it does > > not do the project justice. > > I wasn't going to comment on this as I respect Bruce's judgment > too much (though I disagreed in a big way here). However, since > I'm about the fourth person to comment that *we* think that this > just isn't right and needs to be fixed, I don't feel so bad. > > I can't see saying that IE users need to have a shitty take on > our stuff and tough luck to them if they don't like it. Surely, > it can be fixed so that IE can render properly. I've never met > an instance where I couldn't pacify IE, though I loath its quirks. > Please bear in mind I have a hangover. ;-( Couldn't the web server detect the browser and return, instead of the LFS pages, a picture similar to this one for IE users? http://www.langside.f2s.com/images/bart.gif The text would read "I must get a working web browser before looking at LFS pages". R.
bart.gif
Description: GIF image
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
