On 2/28/06, Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > On the other hand, I suppose if it's going to be included in 4.0.3 > > anyway, it's probably better safe than sorry and we should just drop it > > in for all gcc builds, eh? > > If it's not needed in chapter 5, I'd not bother. Basically the less we > need to do in Chapter 5, the better that is all around. Applying a patch > for zero is...well...rather pointless.
True. /tools is a throwaway. There's lots of stuff disabled in Ch. 5 toolchain or otherwise included in Ch. 6, but not in Ch. 5. Unless the patch is specifically needed to get something to build in Ch. 5 or early Ch. 6, then it's unnecessary. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
