M.Canales.es wrote: > Well, all that is beyond my capabilities. Real developers should to > try to solve this issue.
Not that I'm necessarily a "real developer", but I do understand C, so I'll see if I can replicate the failing environment here and do some tests. I have e2fsprogs, but the rest (the chroot and bind-mount stuff) might take a while. > What I know is that all that is due the "mount --bind" change and has > no relation with the merge of alphabetical stuff into the udev_update > branch, the doing the commit now. I'm guessing right now that it's likely a combination of the bind-mount and the chroot. If we went with Alexander's "manually create all the block devices" approach[1] instead of the bind-mount, we likely wouldn't have this issue either, though that is just a guess. [1] http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-March/056447.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
