Dan Nicholson escribió:
On 7/9/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not make CLFS the main LFS?
The two-stage build method has been proven and tested over years for
the most popular arch, x86. I don't think it would be smart to throw
that away yet. I have no problem increasing the visibility of CLFS as
a viable option for the base system, but I'm not willing to abandon
the two-stage build. It's been pretty quiet on LFS for a while, but I
think with a release and some new activity getting the toolchain
current, LFS will be just as relevant as ever.
I agree with you Dan, but in the future the sysroot method will be
a better option, I think.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
