Matthew Burgess wrote: > Given that the other books under the overall LFS umbrella feed off of > the work done in the LFS book itself, I'd suggest that the canonical > list of users/groups belongs in either the LFS repository, its wiki > or website area. Coupled with that, because the editors of any book > should be able to add to the list, should the need arise, I'd suggest > the Wiki is the most suitable medium.
I think that should work, as long as we don't have any issues with (for instance) spammers or other miscreants changing the list at the same time that somebody needs to refer to it. I'd guess this probably isn't likely, though. (And it helps that you need to have created an account before you can change the Wiki, but creating an account is fairly easy too.) I was actually thinking the editor's guide initially. But if BLFS / CLFS / HLFS editors need to change it too (and I think that's going to be needed, unless we make it a separate SVN repository), then yes, the Wiki sounds better than the editor's guide. :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
