On 9/18/06, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Given that the other books under the overall LFS umbrella feed off of
> the work done in the LFS book itself, I'd suggest that the canonical
> list of users/groups belongs in either the LFS repository, its wiki
> or website area. Coupled with that, because the editors of any book
> should be able to add to the list, should the need arise, I'd suggest
> the Wiki is the most suitable medium.
I was actually thinking the editor's guide initially. But if BLFS /
CLFS / HLFS editors need to change it too (and I think that's going to
be needed, unless we make it a separate SVN repository), then yes, the
Wiki sounds better than the editor's guide. :-)
I personally think this should be in a repository so that we have full
version control over it. That does carry with it the problems of who
has access and how. I think this conversation goes hand-in-hand with
the one Jim started months back to unify the udev rules between the
projects. I think it's a worthy goal, and Jim even started a repo that
Alexander and I had access to, but never did anything with.
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-May/057219.html
I'm CCing Jim because I'd like to reopen this topic of conversation.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
