On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:00:19PM +0000, Peter wrote: > > All other examples througout the book > are shown using the quotes, > so consistency is the main reason. > Note also that some of the typos are: > cat >/ > but throughout the book it is: > cat > / >
This sounds like another of the "all seds should use the same format" complaints. One of the purposes of LFS is to teach, that includes scattering alternatives throughout the book. In particular, changing 'cat >/' to 'cat > /' is surely a waste of an editor's time. Anyway these aren't typos, they work. > ISTR also some failure that was reported on > support due to EOF not being quoted. > If it was an error in the book, it should have been reported to this list or bugzilla/trac (whichever was current) after it was uncovered. Without more details, I'll file that problem under "probable user error". Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
