Bryan Kadzban wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:21:55AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> On 11/2/06, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 07:29:05AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> >> You need at least CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK >> > >> >I'm not so sure on that. Isn't netfilter the filtering (i.e. iptables) >> >interface? >> >> Oops. You're right. Apparently you'll have netlink just with CONFIG_NET. >> >> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0511.3/0304.html > > And I have to think that the OP has CONFIG_NET turned on. So it's still > back to needing the debug info from udevd. > > Although actually, the problem messages from both socket() and bind() > are logged as errors -- so the important bits may be logged without > having to mess with the log level. We'd just need to see what errno is > getting set to (which corresponds to the string that gets put into the > log message).
Hi, I would like to thank you for all the comments. Right now I'v got udev-0.96 reinstalled. I would like to reinstall the udev-103 with debugging to check the errors. I do agree with you I have to investigate this futher. It looks that the errors are not the cause but only a sympton if you know what I mean. I'll try this within a couple of days. Stef -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
