On Tue, Mar 13, at 09:49 Dan Nicholson wrote: > > Suggestions on the explanation welcomed for this patch. > As you miiight :) have noticed by now, I am not an expert in English language but ... <inadvertantly> shouldn't be <inadvertently> ? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
- Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Dan Nicholson
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Bryan Kadzban
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Dan Nicholson
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Matthew Burgess
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Dan Nicholson
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Ag. Hatzimanikas
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Dan Nicholson
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Matthew Burgess
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Dan Nicholson
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Bruce Dubbs
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Dan Nicholson
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Matthew Burgess
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Randy McMurchy
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Dan Nicholson
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/bash Bruce Dubbs
- Re: Glibc ldd needs /bin/ba... Dan Nicholson