Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 3/14/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Matthew Burgess wrote: >> >>> How about: >>> >>> "The <command>ldd</command> shell script contains Bash-specific syntax. >>> Change its shebang line to force the script to be interpreted by Bash in >>> case >>> other shells (see <link href="whatever">BLFS</link>) are installed and >>> linked >>> to <filename class="symlink">/bin/sh</filename> later:" >> I don't particularly like using the word 'shebang' in the book. It's >> slang and I think the book is a bit more formal than that. >> Unfortunately I don't really have a suggestion for a replacement that I >> really like. How about: >> >> "Change its invocation (shebang) line to ... > > I'm going ahead with this now with my preferred "default program > interpreter". Anyone can feel free to change this that doesn't work > for them.
What's a "program interpreter"? I'd prefer "default shell". -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
