El Viernes, 23 de Marzo de 2007 22:52, Dan Nicholson escribió: > 1. We shouldn't always point to the svn version. When a stable book is > released, it should probably point to the stable version of the BLFS > book. Although, there could be a time lapse where this could be a bad > idea, i.e. LFS-6.2 + BLFS-6.1. Still, if someone's following the > stable LFS book, they probably don't want to get forwarded into the > development version of BLFS.
That could be solved easy, if wanted. When a LFS-x.y version is ready to release, just create a temporally &blfs-root;view/x.y symlink pointing to &blfs-root;view/svn and fix the to be created blfs-version entitie. In this way, the links in LFS-x.y always will point to the corresponding BLFS-x.y book, but until that BLFS-x.y book is released the pages showed will be from BLFS-SVN (or the related BLFS branch, in one is created and the symlink is readjusted to point to that branch). > 2. More nitpicky, but we could easily absorb the view/$version part > into another entity. > > I suggest the following two entity additions to general.ent: > > <!ENTITY blfs-version "svn"> > <!ENTITY blfs-view "&blfs-root;view/&blfs-version;/"> I agree. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
