Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 04/20/07 16:55 CST: > Given that all 3 books use different patches, it serves a purely cosmetic > purpose (as far as I know), and upstream will not entertain the patch at all > in its current form, I'd like to drop it. > > Thoughts, comments?
On the computer I'm typing this message on, 'uname -a' reports this: Linux rmlscsi 2.6.14.3 #1 PREEMPT Sat Mar 25 07:47:39 CST 2006 i686 pentium3 i386 GNU/Linux What would it report without the patch? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 01:50:01 up 30 min, 1 user, load average: 0.21, 0.13, 0.11 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
