Matthew Burgess wrote: > Hmm, that "nightmare" seems a bit extreme. Certainly, for native x86-64, > which is the only additional target we're contemplating at the moment, having > 2 paragraphs (or small sections at the most) in the book surrounded in the > relevant profiling syntax, doesn't seem too onerous to me. Once in there, I > doubt they'd need amending much - probably only if newer GCC versions change > relevant portions of the specs file. > > Of course, if more targets are desired in the future, our approach may well > need to change, but for now I think x86 & x86-64 native builds capture the > largest section of the LFS audience and anyone else can continue on to CLFS.
Well, if that's the preferred method, I'll give it a go. Let me see what I can do... -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
