On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:09:58PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Haven't yet looked at my libc, I retested the files that were where > I thought I'd left them, but those matched up.
Hmm, after stripping and then running 'cmp -bl' (which isn't ideal, you have to watch out for the bytes that _don't_ change in text) I have _one_ binary (I assume) byte different in the two /lib/libc-2.5.so files, followed by a difference in the text (what you normally get when you execute /lib/libc.so.6). Turns out I accidentally built the first pass using kernel 2.6.22-rc1, and the second two days later with the intended 2.6.22.1. Anybody who follows my ramblings on clfs-dev will know that using an earlier kernel than the headers, particularly an -rc kernel, is "NOT a Good Idea" (TM) and I'm lucky I wasn't using glibc-2.6. I'll try to do a fresh by-the-book pair of builds (without non-toolchain tests) if I've got time. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
