On 3/4/08, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has been fixed upstream to use a better search for the bash > interpreter that won't use the BASH variable, which is set by the > shell. I don't recall when this went in, but the sed might not be > needed anymore with glibc-2.7.
That's sounds to me like what has happened. The ldd produced by the build process in my tests pointed to bash specifically and not sh. Which I also noted was the same as the toolchain's ldd. If what you say is true (and I imagine you are) then chapter 5 is fine. The sed in chapter 6 is harmless, but no longer needed. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
