Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/18/09 10:53 CST: > I understand your concerns, but let me mention an alternative view. If we > wait > too long, there will be updates to several packages and the longer we wait, > the > more pressure to incorporate those newer packages into the 'upcoming' release.
It doesn't seem to hamper the GNOME project which puts package freeze in place much, much before we do. But as I said earlier, it's your call. I just think it is premature to release a version of LFS that nobody has actually tested in any real life situation. It's only one person's opinion, please don't get worked up about it. I just thought I'd throw it out there. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:08:20 up 12 days, 36 min, 1 user, load average: 2.48, 0.84, 0.33 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
