Am 06.07.2010 23:28, schrieb Andrew Benton: > On 06/07/10 18:50, Sebastian Plotz wrote: >> I just want to start a discussion, if it would be meaningful to replace >> Sysvinit with Upstart ... > Reading through the README in the upstart source, it depends on libnih, > nih-dbus-tool and D-BUS so it would mean adding 3 extra packages into LFS. > > Andy Yes, this is an good argument against using Upstart in LFS.
Here are the requirements of systemd: Linux kernel >= 2.6.30 (with autofs4, devtmpfs, cgroups) libudev >= 151 libcgroup >= 0.35 vala >= 0.80 gtk+ >= 2.20 dbus >= 1.2.24 So I think BLFS would be a better place for it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
