Andrew wrote: > I think that's a difference of perspective. Automated building and a > package manager are important if you think LFS is a distro, however, > many of us think of LFS as an education tool that forces the user to > think hard about system building
Not exactly. No package management means I need to wait a few hours to see the result of every small change I make to my own build. No automation means I need to waste a day copying commands, with a relatively high chance of hidden error for each small experiment. I am not at all referring to package management as a means of distribution. --yaacov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
