----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Dubbs" <[email protected]> To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 7:03 PM Subject: Re: LFS SVN-20110204 error report
> > I think we should build a relatively complete system for c,c++. > Avoiding an error message by not building a portion of the package is > not the way to go. Reporting problems is sufficient. > I understand. I googled if some app use libmudflap out of gcc and find nothing that matter for my usage. So I conclude I don't need libmudflap. Many other are in the same case not needing that lib but they just don't know this fact. > > Mostly similary, is really openmp required for everyone? > > openmp is "An API for multi-platform shared-memory parallel programming > in C/C++ and Fortran." I don't know where this comes into gcc. > libgomp is the GNU implementation of the OpenMP Application Programming Interface (API) for multi-platform shared-memory parallel programming in C/C++ and Fortran. Unless using some parallel programming, that is not used. > >> glibc: > > > > Did you have a random result at during glibc .configure with this test > > checking whether ranlib is necessary... > > I have 'no' and haven't noticed it before. Perhaps it is dependent on > the host system. After some hard time trying to reproduce, I finally write the attached script inspired by configure. It find ranlib is not needed most of the time but sometime find yes and in my script that will break the loop. Random answer could be found on any machines, and there is more luck to fail on a loaded one. I have not enought knowledge of strace to understand what happen. My understanding is that the test fail when 'ranlib conftest.a' is not run on the same second than previously created archive. Gilles
glibc-configure-ranlib.sh
Description: Binary data
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
