Matthew Burgess wrote: > Firstly, thanks for taking the time to do this, it looks pretty good to me.
I haven't had time to review yet. > Secondly, what follows are probably bike-shed topics, but I'll throw my > 2p in along with everyone elses anyway :) : > > make-aux-files.sh: Why renaming things to lsb-bootscripts? If we're > migrating (which I think we should), shouldn't we just move the lsb > scripts out of contrib and then continue to refer to the package as > the lfs-bootscripts? I was thinking the same thing. Also, would this change, along with the /run, etc changes, be enough to roll the LFS version to 7.0? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
