Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 5/31/11 10:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> It just another package and I'd like to avoid that in LFS even if it is >> CMMI. If the install of the bootscripts is basically copying files and >> setting some symlinks, we don't need a C program to do just that. > > Well, yes, that is what it's doing, but it's also working out > dependencies on those scripts (from the headers) and determines startup, > shutdown order auto-magically based on those deps. Sure beats doing it > manually. > >> OTOH, putting it into BLFS is not an issue with me. > > OK. It's pretty core to the LSB script workings, to me it seems silly to > separate it, but that's your call. > (http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/initsrcinstrm.html)
Also see http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/swinstall.html#SWINSTALL-INTRO They may say that you don't have to actually use rpm, but only that a conforming application can process rpm packages. I see little difference. I don't see us putting rpm into LFS any time soon. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
