On Tue, 31 May 2011 21:55:37 -0500 Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand the objection to C. It's not really that > > difficult to understand or maintain - the community has the skillset > > required for a simple package like this one. Regardless, I volunteered > > to take over maintenance of that package so you could consider LightCube > > OS as upstream for that one, if you wish. I haven't had a chance yet to > > put that code in an official location on our servers, but I will aim to > > do so this week. > > It just another package and I'd like to avoid that in LFS even if it is > CMMI. If the install of the bootscripts is basically copying files and > setting some symlinks, we don't need a C program to do just that. OTOH, > putting it into BLFS is not an issue with me. It seems to me the solution is to integrate the C program into the bootscripts. The bootscripts used to just need "make install" but now they should also need a "make" (to compile the tools needed to install the bootscripts). Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
