On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:15:27 -0800
> Qrux <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As for the "64-bit" works in practice...BIND is an example of a downstream
>> app that seems to want to look in /lib64. Whether it's looking for
>> ld64.so.1, ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, or something else even, I can't say. I do
>> know that it doesn't work when the root symlink (/lib64 -> /lib) isn't
>> there. But I don't know what other symlink dependencies it has, if any. I
>> suppose there's also a possibility that BIND could be build differently from
>> the BLFS book, but I'm not sure what's being gained by not having the 64-bit
>> symlinks.
>
> Bind works fine on my computer with everything in /lib. The only things
> which won't work are precompiled binaries.
I don't think anyone referred to precomp bins. I presume all discussions here
are about source builds.
1) Which BLFS version?
2) Are you on a 64-bit only platform?
3) Are you running in the root-fs or the chroot-jail?
Q
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
