On 04/22/2012 12:19 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 4/22/12 11:33 AM, LFS Trac wrote: >> #3066: Chapter 5 ncurses fails with (old?) gpm on host >> -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- >> Reporter: dj@… | Owner: lfs-book@… >> Type: task | Status: new >> Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.2 >> Component: Book | Version: SVN >> Severity: normal | Keywords: >> -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- >> Host system is again Gentoo Live DVD 2011. I had to add --without-gpm to >> the configure flags to get around it. > (I tried updating the ticket in trac, but that required me resetting my > password and now the site puts me in an infinite redirect loop... trac > is being wonky) > > Anyway, unless ncurses is doing something non-standard to detect gpm, I > don't think this should be happening. The point of the chapter 5 > toolchain is to remove /usr or anything like it from the search paths. > DJ can you dig in the logs to find out what ncurses is doing to detect > gpm? In the meantime, I've downloaded the gentoo live dvd and am going > to play a bit. > > JH As it turns out, it was a problem with the host. /usr/lib64/libgpm.so is not a symlink, but rather a linker script that points to another linker script that points to an invalid destination (ie: no 64bit libgpm). I was going to close as invalid, but then I wondered if we want our chapter 5 ncurses linked to something that does not exist in the chroot environment?
-- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
