On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:07:39AM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 20:07 -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
> > We *could* apply the patch, then autoreconf, then regenerate a new
> > patch, for LFS (to avoid pkg-config or other weirdness causing issues in
> > chapter 6's autoreconf run). Or we could give it a while (leaving the
> > book at udev-182) and see what happens. Any preferences?
>
> I'd prefer to leave the book at udev-182. It's clear that motivated
> folks and upstream are working on this, so it's not like it's not going
> to get addressed. In the meantime, udev-182 continues to build and work
> in our current set of packages, so there's no rush to upgrade it.
>
I don't share your optimism that upstream will accept this,
although I hope I'm wrong. For the moment, 182 is good enough.
However, I will have a go at merging the write_{cd,net} rules stuff
from 182 into udev-config so that it's ready if/when we are able to
move forward.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
