On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:19:13AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> I don't share your optimism that upstream will accept this, > >> although I hope I'm wrong. For the moment, 182 is good enough. > > I've been watching the mailing lists and William Hubbs has been trying > to get a set of patches into systemd for several days. He is being > ignored by upstream AFAICT. They have seemed quite arrogant about it in > the past when they have commented. > > I don't know how long -182 will stay sufficient. It's possible it could > be years. In any case we will need to patch systemd to add back > capabilities that they have removed if/when we do trasnsition. My > inclination is to use a build script or a Makefile bypassing the > autotools completely if we decide to extract udev from systemd. It's > faster, more straight forward and we don't really need to worry about > supporting the BSDs, AIX, s390, etc. > > -- Bruce I think that the version of udev-config I uploaded has everything which was recently removed, so it ought to work with your approach - unless you drop a separate udev-config.
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
