Armin K. wrote: > On 12/11/2013 11:33 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Those of you who follow lfs-book will have seen some commits fly by from >> Armin, who asked to be granted access to work on the systemd branch. As >> I've been lacking time recently, and lost a bit of motivation for >> maintaining the branch myself, I was happy to accept the offer of help. >> >> Welcome back to the editing team, Armin!
I'm glad you decide to come back also. > Thanks. > > For those that don't know, you can read systemd version of the book > online at [1]. > > Please note that I've just applied systemd specific changes to lfs > development book which was the most current at the time, but didn't yet > run any test build. I hope to do one during the weekend though. > > That said, current build instructions might or might not work correctly. > Any feedback or help is welcome, being it a typo fix, instructions fix > or even instructions addition. Just send a message to this mailing list > or create ticket in lfs trac. > > LFS systemd branch will continue to share most of the packages with lfs > development version and the ones not available in lfs with blfs svn > version of the book. I'll try and make sure that differences between lfs > non-systemd and systemd branches are minimal when it comes to shared stuff. > > Note that systemd version is currently missing a page which installs and > describes lfs network scripts package, which is entirely systemd > specific, although it uses same networking scripts as lfs does. There's > a ticket already for that one and I hope I'll get to it soon enough. > > Given that everything goes well, I was hoping that we can release LFS > systemd book along with the next stable LFS book. It's too early now to > speak about that though :D We plan on the next LFS version on March 1st with a package freeze probably around mid-February. > There won't be any BLFS book which follows lfs systemd book, at least > not maintained by me. Project is big enough that it's too hard for me > alone to maintain it. I might, however, create some (not strictly a > book) instructions on how to modify some blfs packages to utilize > systemd correctly. I do not promise anything yet. I suggest that we might want to add a 'Systemd Issues' or similar name to BLFS packages that need them. If the Gnome desktop is restored, then I suspect that the intro to the section would mention systemd and apply to the entire section. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
