I'm not going to quote Armin's message but answer a couple of points.
A lot of the ideas in systemd are good. It's the implementation that
sucks. Why can't we just substitute journald for syslogd? Why do we
have to have a different init to go with it?
Why does Gnome now insist on systemd?
Is systemd useful on a LAMP server that does not have X?
The UNIX Philosophy is not obsolete. It's a lot easier to get a small
program right than a large one. It's also easier to find problems and
fix them. Anyone who has studied Software Engineering will understand that.
Xorg is a dinosaur that needs to be redesigned and replaced. That is
being done, but it really should have nothing to do with systemd.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
