On 13-03-2015 13:13, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >> But I would much prefer to disable as much as we could by configure or >> makefile choices, only moving out the others, after compressing. Move, >> then compress wouldn't work in an upgrade. Mus be compress, then move. > > I don't like compressing. In my sandbox, the files in question only > amount to 7.9M. That's trivial. Compressing would make it more > difficult to restore the library if the user decides that it is needed.
My reason for compressing was that there is no chance that a "smart" package finds it. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
