Krishna Ganugapati wrote:
Figured it out. zlib's website lists zlib.1.2.3 not the zlib.1.2.2 as
required by LFS6.1 - as a result one of the soft links is libz.so ->
libz.so.1.2.2 - but the built versions are libz.so.1.2.3
I now understand what FBBG means :-)
Krishna
I don't think that's the problem. I just built an LFS 6.1 system, and
used zlib 1.2.3 (in fact the 6.1 errata recommends it) with no problems.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
