On Sunday 10 June 2007 11:00, Walter Barnes wrote: > Which would be the best way to go: redo 6.2 using glibc 2.4 instead > of 2.3.6 or try the development version which uses glibc 2.5?
If I were you I would try the development LFS. AFAIK glibc-2.4 behaves better with gcc-4.1 and binutils-2.17 than with gcc-4.0 and binutils-2.16. -- Nothing but perfection Vladimir A. Pavlov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
