Thanks for the info, I did not consider the impact of changing glibc on the other tool chain packages. What I will try is building the tool chain from the development version and the rest from 6.2.
Thanks again, Walter ----- Original Message ---- From: Vladimir A. Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 7:06:30 PM Subject: Re: Upgrading glibc On Sunday 10 June 2007 11:00, Walter Barnes wrote: > Which would be the best way to go: redo 6.2 using glibc 2.4 instead > of 2.3.6 or try the development version which uses glibc 2.5? If I were you I would try the development LFS. AFAIK glibc-2.4 behaves better with gcc-4.1 and binutils-2.17 than with gcc-4.0 and binutils-2.16. -- Nothing but perfection Vladimir A. Pavlov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page ____________________________________________________________________________________ No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
