When building and installing (6.9) the glibc ... what test errors are acceptable? What are the guidelines for determining "quirkiness" vs. "woops, I screwed up" ?
For example, the following error (and a refusal to finish the make) .. I assume to be bad: make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/noload-mem] Error 127 Scratch I am in the process of doing it again (re-patch/etc..) and see what happens. I am building on a 2.6.32 kernel, and I might very well have left the 2.6.25 in the copied shell command... However, I was just wondering what tests, when they fail, are FAIL rather than fail;) :) ? -- ==================================== David Scott Williams twitter: @dscott_williams blog: http://deadpenguinsociety.org ==================================== -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
