On 11/23/2013 3:05 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > I've also got a much-less-important comment on your kernel names as > a reply to your earlier post: You had four variants of 3.12 lfs > kernels. All of them had the same size in bytes, one was from nearly > two days before the rest, of the others two had the same time and the > other was a second later. To me, that looks unusual : > > Mostly, a fresh build with different options will produce a kernel > with a slightly different size. It's not impossible that minor > changes might produce same-size binaries, but obviously with > different md5sums. But when I see three kernels with essentially > the same time I start to worry - I don't think even the fastest > machines can produce an updated kernel so quickly.
Well I have a very, very fast processor, which I designed and built myself. Seriously, the "other" kernels are merely copies of the original, which I made in a desperate attempt to see if the reason I was getting "invalid file name" was because the name was somehow wrong. I now know that was not the case, but I keep learning. Alan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
