> I noticed this note about GMP: > > "The default settings of GMP produce libraries optimized for the host > processor." > > Using the default configure settings in the summary of build options I > see "Host type: skylake-pc-linux-gnu". I then see gcc is using > "-mtune=skylake" when compiling the GMP library. Now if I use > configfsf.guess as mentioned in the LFS book, it will build with "Host > type: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu". So I've made a note to recompile GMP when > I move it to the older system.
Isn't that a PITA? But check out the "fat" option. > > Beyond GMP, is anyone aware of other LFS packages which, when using > the default compilation options, could lead to binaries that are > tightly coupled to the host build's processor? I'd like my build to > be as generic as possible so that it can run on any other x86_64 > system. I do too, just got into trouble over this and had to rebuild. Apparently that is the only package (so far!) to be so presumptuous. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
