Am 2019-03-19 10:31, schrieb Frans de Boer:
On 19-03-19 10:19, Michael Shell wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:15:25 +0100
thomas <tho...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
Renaming /tools to another name will be appropriate to come over this
issue.
Perhaps a more functionally descriptive name would also help in other
ways. After all, the stuff in /tools is for a *temporary* LFS system,
a first stage of the LFS build process.
So, perhaps a dir name such as "lfs_stage1" or "lfs_tmp_toolchain"
would
not only avoid the Debian namespace collision, but also would be more
educational, potentially less confusing to the newbie, and
functionally
descriptive as well.
Just my $0.02,
Mike Shell
I already use for years now the link name 'lfs'. I build script files
and use a common include which contains the current link name. Easy
when I change the link name again, I only have to change it in the
common include file once.
My 0,01 Euro cents ;)
Frans.
Created a ticket to have an eye on that:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/4445
--
Thomas
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
