On 5/24/20 12:27 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:11:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
This is LFS r11848 cross-chap5 branch from 13th May and I'm trying
to understand why tests fail (although I don't always achieve any
understanding).
So, I gave vim's tests another try, but they failed somewhat badly:
Executed: 2667 Tests
Skipped: 47 Tests
FAILED: 3 Tests
[snip]
I didn't have any older versions of vim handy, but looking at the
9.1 book we were using vim-8.2.0190, so I downloaded that. With
gcc-10.1.0 it too fails, although not quite as badly:
Executed: 2407 Tests
Skipped: 49 Tests
FAILED: 1 Tests
Failures:
[snip]
I'di then taken a look at fedora, who are using 8.2.0806 with
gcc-10.1, although I don't think they run vims testsuite. Latest
when I looked was 8.2.0814. That too appears to take for ever to
run its tests, eventually ending similarly to 8.2.0716.
For me, vim-8.2.0814 tests take 120 seconds in chroot on a virgin LFS build.
I think I did run down the tests hanging problem. We have a
configuration in /etc/bashrc where we have:
source $VIMRUNTIME/defaults.vim
let skip_defaults_vim=1
If I remove /etc/vimrc, all tests pass without the hang. That is the
way a user would build in a normal LFS build.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
