Hi,

2011/4/21 Aℓex Converse <aconve...@google.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:56:07AM -0700, Aℓex Converse wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote:
>>> > Do not call av_log_ask_for_sample() from av_log_missing_feature() 
>>> > depending on
>>> > the value of a flag parameter. Instead, call av_log_ask_for_sample() 
>>> > directly
>>> > where this is desired. This simplifies av_log_missing_feature() and makes 
>>> > for
>>> > a nicer API.
>>> > ---
>>> >  libavcodec/aac_adtstoasc_bsf.c |    5 +++--
>>> >  libavcodec/aacdec.c            |   20 +++++++++++++-------
>>> >  libavcodec/aacsbr.c            |    5 +++--
>>> >  libavcodec/ac3dec.c            |    3 ++-
>>> >  libavcodec/alsdec.c            |    2 +-
>>> >  libavcodec/amrnbdec.c          |    3 ++-
>>> >  libavcodec/amrwbdec.c          |    6 ++++--
>>> >  libavcodec/avcodec.h           |    6 +-----
>>> >  libavcodec/eac3dec.c           |   12 ++++++++----
>>> >  libavcodec/flacdec.c           |    2 +-
>>> >  libavcodec/mpc8.c              |    3 ++-
>>> >  libavcodec/utils.c             |   11 +++--------
>>> >  libavcodec/vc1.c               |    2 +-
>>> >  libavcodec/vp8.c               |    6 ++++--
>>> >  libavcodec/wmavoice.c          |    3 ++-
>>> >  libavformat/rtpdec_latm.c      |    8 +++++---
>>> >  libavformat/rtpdec_qt.c        |    9 ++++++---
>>> >  libavformat/spdifdec.c         |    5 +++--
>>> >  18 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > --- a/libavcodec/avcodec.h
>>> > +++ b/libavcodec/avcodec.h
>>> > @@ -4097,12 +4097,8 @@ unsigned int av_xiphlacing(unsigned char *s, 
>>> > unsigned int v);
>>> >  * @param[in] avc a pointer to an arbitrary struct of which the first 
>>> > field is
>>> >  * a pointer to an AVClass struct
>>> >  * @param[in] feature string containing the name of the missing feature
>>> > - * @param[in] want_sample indicates if samples are wanted which exhibit 
>>> > this feature.
>>> > - * If want_sample is non-zero, additional verbage will be added to the 
>>> > log
>>> > - * message which tells the user how to report samples to the development
>>> > - * mailing list.
>>> >  */
>>> > -void av_log_missing_feature(void *avc, const char *feature, int 
>>> > want_sample);
>>> > +void av_log_missing_feature(void *avc, const char *feature);
>>> >
>>> >  /**
>>> >  * Log a generic warning message asking for a sample. This function is
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> This is a public header.
>>
>> You mean that this would require a major/minor bump?  We're in the period
>> fter the bump that is officially declared unstable API time, plus those
>> functions are not supposed to be used outside of libav* as the Doxygen
>> explains:
>>
>>  /**
>>  * Logs a generic warning message about a missing feature. This function is
>>  * intended to be used internally by Libav (libavcodec, libavformat, etc.)
>>  * only, and would normally not be used by applications.
>>
>> I didn't make this up, don't shoot the messenger :)
>
> Since libavformat and libavcodec were bumped at the same time and the
> API is declared unstable I suppose this is ok. For extra karma
> consider moving it to a not-installed header.

It needs to remain av_*() prefixed since it's shared between avf/avc, though.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to