On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:46:04AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > --- > > 30 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 360 deletions(-) > > Why?
Because they are cruft - easy to restore in the unlikely case they are needed, pointless clutter in the meantime. > do these not compile if turned on? I could not be bothered to test, but I'm quite sure that many of them will fail to compile. In the past, when I reenabled some commented-out code block it would often fail to even compile ... > Can we turn some of them into av_dlog()s instead? Not worth the effort IMO. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
