Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:54:13AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:46:04AM -0700, Alex Converse wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: >> >> > --- >> >> > 30 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 360 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> Why? >> > >> > Because they are cruft - easy to restore in the unlikely case they are >> > needed, pointless clutter in the meantime. >> > >> >> do these not compile if turned on? >> > >> > I could not be bothered to test, but I'm quite sure that many of them >> > will fail to compile. In the past, when I reenabled some commented-out >> > code block it would often fail to even compile ... >> > >> >> Can we turn some of them into av_dlog()s instead? >> > >> > Not worth the effort IMO. >> >> Turning on disabled debug code has helped me solve numerous issues. > > Would you not have been able to write that debug code on-the-fly in a > few instants?
For most of them: no. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
