On date Monday 2011-05-30 23:12:53 +0200, Anton Khirnov encoded: 
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:18:31 +0200, Stefano Sabatini 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> > > +const AVOption *avopt_find(void *obj, const char *name, const char *unit,
> > > +                           int opt_flags, int search_flags);
> > 
> > Namescheme: av_opt_find() looks better (consistent with the av_opt_
> > scheme), I'm not sure this is meant as a general replacement for
> > av_find_opt() though.
> 
> Yes it is, av_find_opt is meant to be deprecated.
> As for the naming bikeshed, avopt_* namespace is consistent with avcodec_,
> avformat_, avfilter_, avio_ etc. It also saves you one character ;)

Note that FF^H^Hlibav* is pretty inconsistent in this regard (avio_,
avcodec_, avfilter_, *but* av_img_, av_eval, av_file_, av_crc_, same
for constants, we have AV_OPT_, AV_CPU_..., AV_SAMPLE_FMT_,
AV_CH_... *but* AVMEDIA_TYPE_, AVDISCARD_, AVCOL_).

I tend to prefer the av_ variant since it looks more readable to me,
in the case of AVOptions I see there are already some functions which
start with av_opt_ so I was thinking to keep that scheme.
-- 
No shirt, no shoes, no service.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to