Hi, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> wrote: > Inspection of compiled code shows gcc handles these fine on its own. > Benchmarking also shows no measurable speed difference. > > Removing the remaining cases in get_cabac_bypass_sign_x86() does > cause more substantial changes to the compiled code with uncertain > impact. > > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> > --- > libavcodec/x86/cabac.h | 12 +++--------- > libavcodec/x86/h264_i386.h | 32 +++++++------------------------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
Fine with me. Does this conflict with Jason's atom patch? Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
