"Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> wrote: >> Inspection of compiled code shows gcc handles these fine on its own. >> Benchmarking also shows no measurable speed difference. >> >> Removing the remaining cases in get_cabac_bypass_sign_x86() does >> cause more substantial changes to the compiled code with uncertain >> impact. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> >> --- >> libavcodec/x86/cabac.h | 12 +++--------- >> libavcodec/x86/h264_i386.h | 32 +++++++------------------------- >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > Fine with me. Does this conflict with Jason's atom patch?
If it does, it should be trivial to merge. This is mostly removing lines. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
