On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:07:41PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:46:26AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Kostya Shishkov <[email protected]> writes: > >> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:52:26PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> >> + int8x8_fmul_int32(subband_samples[k][l], > >> >> + > >> >> &high_freq_vq[s->high_freq_vq[k][l]][subsubframe * 8], > >> >> + s->scale_factor[k][l][0]); > >> > > >> > some Diego might complain about identation here > >> > >> This looked more sane than all other alternatives. > > > > more sane than > > > > int8x8_fmul_int32(subband_samples[k][l], > > &high_freq_vq[s->high_freq_vq[k][l]][subsubframe * 8], > > s->scale_factor[k][l][0]); > > Look at the context. At the indentation level of the block it's in, > that would push the longer line over 80 columns.
I can live with that, better in fact, than with the non-standard and arguably messed-up indentation. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
